Summary of survey results
More than two-thirds of GP respondents found that in the last 3 months access to outpatient appointments for their medical patients was poor or very poor, with almost 80 per cent saying access for surgical patients was poor or very poor. No respondents said access was very good, with only 2 per cent reporting access was good for surgical appointments.
Three quarters of respondents felt that access to outpatient appointments had deteriorated over the last three years.
GPs felt waiting times for out patient appointments were unacceptably long for a number of specialties, but were worse for:
- orthopaedics (92 per cent of respondents)
- ear, nose and throat surgery (46 per cent)
- urology (41 per cent)
- neurology (66 per cent)
- gastroenterology (49 per cent)
- endocrinology (39 per cent)
- respiratory medicine (31 per cent).
- made more frequent visits to see their GP
- had decreased mobility and levels of activity.
- presented more often to emergency departments
- needed higher doses of existing medications to maintain their health.
- young and mid-aged patients who had been unable to work because of the pain and disability caused by their problems
- older patients unable to keep mobile at all, are home bound and depressed
- inability to get specialist opinions has led to delays in making serious diagnoses, as well as delayed follow-up of serious illnesses
- public outpatient clinics do not exist in some regional areas and for some specialties in metropolitan areas
- that as appointments in some specialties were so hard to come by, patients were encouraged to see specialists privately, which meant incurring out-of-pocket expenses
- that the demand pressures on staff in Outpatients were excessive and often unreasonable.
A State Health Initiative Policy paper was provided to the Minister for Health and Opposition Health spokesperson on Friday 28 July 2006, and the media campaign started on 31 July 2006.